"Baby Killer" Gets What He Deserves

bwohlgemuth · Post by **bwohlgemuth** » Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:37 pm

At least according to some "anti-war" people....

National Guardsman Brutally Attacked In Pierce County

The soldier was walking to a convenience store when a sport utility vehicle pulled up alongside him and the driver asked if he was in the military and if he had been in any action.

The driver then got out of the vehicle, displayed a gun and shouted insults at the victim. Four other suspects exited the vehicle and knocked the soldier down, punching and kicking him.

â€œAnd during the assault the suspects called him a baby killer. At that point they got into the car and drove off and left him on the side of the road,â€

poopstains · Post by **poopstains** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:44 pm

Wait a minute are you saying that the soldier deserved to get beat up just because he is in the Guard, I hope I'm misunderstanding this thread.

QWETTY · Post by **QWETTY** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 7:59 pm

exactly! if me and poopstains tehre are understanding you, your a sick guy.

any person in the ramed forces should NEVER EVER EVER be looked down upon because of the war they are in. They chose to defend our country, not attack anotehr. Its not their fault they are in a war that most ppl don't support. (overly-republicans, dont get mad that i said ppl dont support this war... or say that im generalizing... u asses.)

bwohlgemuth · Post by **bwohlgemuth** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:30 pm

Umm...did you see the note I put at the top?

At least according to some "anti-war" people....

No, I do not support assaulting random solidiers. Most people know where I stand on the war and my support for the soldiers and their mission.

QWETTY · Post by **QWETTY** » Mon Sep 04, 2006 8:56 pm

bwohlgemuth wrote:Umm...did you see the note I put at the top?

At least according to some "anti-war" people....
No, I do not support assaulting random solidiers. Most people know where I stand on the war and my support for the soldiers and their mission.

kk lol... BIG misunderstanding. You gotta understand, we here in indiana dont read too good.. lol. on the stand in the war... i support the troops 100%, j/ not their leaders and their ways of doing things

flapjacks · Post by **flapjacks** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 3:14 pm

QWETTY wrote: (overly-republicans, dont get mad that i said ppl dont support this war... or say that im generalizing... u asses.)

*cough* bassjones *cough*

DELETED · Post by **DELETED** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 3:26 pm

DELETED

bassjones · Post by **bassjones** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 4:00 pm

flapjacks wrote:
QWETTY wrote: (overly-republicans, dont get mad that i said ppl dont support this war... or say that im generalizing... u asses.)
*cough* bassjones *cough*

HUH? How'd I get brought into this? I'm a Libertarian not a Republican. I support both the war and the troops. I also support other people speaking their mind, whatever their viewpoint is, provided it doesn't amount to treason or sabatoge.

Feel free to speak your mind. I'm certainly not going to back down from my viewpoint, but that doesn't mean I don't respect your right to yours. Hell, half of my band disagrees with me. The other half disagrees with them. We get along just fine, thank you very much. I express opinion freely. I don't take it too personally, and I certainly don't hold it against anyone. Unlike some other people on here who hold to the opposing view.

Grindspine · Post by **Grindspine** » Tue Sep 05, 2006 7:44 pm

You CAN be libertarian AND republican...

They are NOT mutually exclusive.

There is right to left (conservative to liberal) and an additional axis of authoritarian to libertarian. (Going from heavy state rule to total responsibility and authority left to the people instead of the state.)

Someone can be liberal libertarian, liberal authoritarian, conservative libertarian, conservative authoritarian, or moderate between any of those points.

........authoritarian
.................|
.................|
liberal--------------conservative
.................|
.................|
.........libertarian

Ironically, I fall in the middle of all four. Whereas, jones, for example, falls in the lower right quadrant, exhibiting both libertarian and conservative views.

Everyone more clear on this now??

sharkmansix · Post by **sharkmansix** » Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:34 am

Yes...but could you be a libertarian with republican tendencies?

bassjones · Post by **bassjones** » Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:47 am

sharkmansix wrote:Yes...but could you be a libertarian with republican tendencies?

I think that's me in a nutshell. fiscally libertarian, socially libertarian (except on abortion), republican tendencies on national defense.

WBOB · Post by **WBOB** » Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:56 pm

Political labeling!

it's almost like an art form!