Please search google for "loose change 2nd edition"

Oliver's Army · Post by **Oliver's Army** » Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:48 pm

Do we have a 'kicking a dead horse' emoticon?

bassjones · Post by **bassjones** » Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:55 pm

Openly endorsing animal abuse. I'm shocked at you, Ollie

WBOB · Post by **WBOB** » Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:03 pm

im moving to the you pee and im gonna stock grenades and rifles and grow a righteous beard ... bc some kid thinks hippie videos hold the key to truth concerning some wicked stuff that went down some yrs ago

echosauce1 · Post by **echosauce1** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 11:01 pm

My conspiracy theory is that the twin towers are still there and the govt just paid David Copperfield to turn them invisible. I'll cite references when I find them.

bwohlgemuth · Post by **bwohlgemuth** » Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:03 am

Max, a few things...

#1. Rolls Royce is NOT the only engine provider for 757s. In fact, Boeing usually has at least two providers (P&W or GE) who can make engines for the aircraft. What engines aer put on the airframe are decided by the purchasing company.

Link to Pratt & Whitney's 757 engine is here.

#2. WTC7 fell because of the strcutural design of the building. The electrical substation it had to be built around made the building structurally weaker, but still sound enough to stand before WTC 1&2 debris smacked into it.

#3. Black boxes are rarely recovered when the plane crashes intactly into something (like a mountain) because the debris and forces invole usually shred it to pieces. Only reason the boxes for the WTC flights survived is they flew through the building or had enough time to decelerate as the plane moved through the building.

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 2:57 am

well your wrong homie

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 3:05 am

firefighters in the first tower that got struck that has said " i have located the fire, i will only need a couple of lines to put it out"...those firefighters have been shut up by the gov.....

do you understand what that means homeboy?

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 3:19 am

oh and for your info...everbody still knows that rolls-royce makes enginges avialble to airliners......dispite the fact that you apparently dont... airliners use prat and whiteny too im sure..but thats all irrelevant anyways....oh..and why oh why would a document that was trying to debunk the video say any thing like this "Loose Change implies 757's only have Pratt & Whitney engines made of steel and titanium alloy. This is incorrect, because the engines used in Flight 77 are Rolls-Royce engines. " that is a quote that mr sharkxcc put up on page one just to refresh you memo.........hmmm very interesting

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 3:22 am

#3. Black boxes are rarely recovered when the plane crashes intactly into something (like a mountain) because the debris and forces invole usually shred it to pieces. Only reason the boxes for the WTC flights survived is they flew through the building or had enough time to decelerate as the plane moved through the building.

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha h ah ha ha ha h ah ha ha ha h ah ha ha ha ha h ah ha ha h ah ha ha ha ha ha h a

bwohlgemuth · Post by **bwohlgemuth** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 6:17 am

oh and for your info...everbody still knows that rolls-royce makes enginges avialble to airliners......dispite the fact that you apparently dont... airliners use prat and whiteny too im sure..but thats all irrelevant anyways....oh..and why oh why would a document that was trying to debunk the video say any thing like this "Loose Change implies 757's only have Pratt & Whitney engines made of steel and titanium alloy. This is incorrect, because the engines used in Flight 77 are Rolls-Royce engines. " that is a quote that mr sharkxcc put up on page one just to refresh you memo.........hmmm very interesting

Huh????

well your wrong homie

Well, that was woefully unimpressive.....

Where are your counterpoints to the three topics I listed?

Loose change is a joke, I watched the entire movie and found myself asking more questions about the authors and their investigative experience....

firefighters in the first tower that got struck that has said " i have located the fire, i will only need a couple of lines to put it out"...those firefighters have been shut up by the gov.....

I'm not a firefighter, but judging from the amount of smoke being generated by 9/11 across several floors, I doubt "a couple of hoses" are going to put out that fire.

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:52 pm

well i feel sorry for you then

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:12 pm

i will start siting sources for all you folks out there form the "loose change" video.

and then you can go check them out for yourself
abd then tell me if the info presented id libel.

ok first up....bomb sniffing dogs are removed from buildings prior to "attacks"
heres the link to article used in loose change

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld ... 5660.story

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:19 pm

more on bomb sniffing dogs....

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/june20 ... edclue.htm

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:20 pm

and here as well

http://www.911research.com/wtc/attack/preparation.html

Max Forbing · Post by **Max Forbing** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:33 pm

so what kind of enginge did flight 77 have in it?

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911security.html