A serious question about our president

adam atherton · Post by **adam atherton** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:25 am

bassjones wrote: Coherent arguable thought.

Massage...Bored wrote:Frustrated personal attack.

bassjones · Post by **bassjones** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:29 am

Massage...Bored wrote:
bassjones wrote: The average unemployment during Bush has been lower than the average unemployment under Clinton.

Always gotta throw one of these in when you get the opportunity, don't ya?

bassjones wrote: He's turned into Clinton - "a little more talk and a lot less action..." Pains me to say it, but they are one in the same - minus the moral terpitude.

Get f*cking over yourself dude. Marijuana versus Cocaine, I wonder who loses that battle? Blow jobs versus (probably) much more ridiculous sh*t you have to do to be in Skull & Bones. What the f*ck ever, you really should stop posting in this.

Low unemployment's a bad thing? It was good under Clinton too - and Bush Sr.... and Reagan.

Marijuana - I didn't care about.
Cocaine - no proof, don't care either way

Skull & Bones - college when he was 21. He's in his late 50's now...
Clinton's blow job was IN THE FREAKING OVAL OFFICE! and with an intern... and his moral terpitude involved serious allegations of sexual harrassment - Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers - RAPE!!! - Juanita Broderick - death threats - the former Miss Arkansas (name escapes me right off hand) - not just one blow job. Had those allegations been made against a Republican, the NOW NAGS would have been screaming (screaching) for his head on a platter. W/ Clinton, not a word...

If you or Jay paid a dime in taxes that you didn't get refunded and didn't get the $300 rebate, somebody screwed up, because you were entitled to it. That's Federal income tax, not FICA, SS, State income or other...

Massage...Bored · Post by **Massage...Bored** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:32 am

adam atherton wrote:
bassjones wrote: Coherent arguable thought.

Massage...Bored wrote:Frustrated personal attack.

I was wondering how long it would take the Right Wing Army to retaliate. Now all we need is General Bwog and Corporal WBOB, then we have the whole regiment.

Massage...Bored · Post by **Massage...Bored** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:42 am

bassjones wrote:
Low unemployment's a bad thing? It was good under Clinton too - and Bush Sr.... and Reagan.

No, you know what I was referring to, any chance you see to run Clinton through the mud you completely take it. Its annoying and sad.

bassjones wrote: Skull & Bones - college when he was 21. He's in his late 50's now...

Well, sh*t, I better start doing some depraved sh*t right now because in 25 years it won't matter, apparently, what I did when I was this age. According to your screwed logic, that is. Seriously, did you think that through before you type-set it?

bassjones wrote: Clinton's blow job was IN THE FREAKING OVAL OFFICE! and with an intern... and his moral terpitude involved serious allegations of sexual harrassment - Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers - RAPE!!! - Juanita Broderick - death threats - the former Miss Arkansas (name escapes me right off hand) - not just one blow job. Had those allegations been made against a Republican, the NOW NAGS would have been screaming (screaching) for his head on a platter. W/ Clinton, not a word...

Not a word? They impeached the guy for chrissakes!

bassjones wrote: If you or Jay paid a dime in taxes that you didn't get refunded and didn't get the $300 rebate, somebody screwed up, because you were entitled to it. That's Federal income tax, not FICA, SS, State income or other...

I wonder who? I filled out and filed my sh*t properly and with the aid of my father and HR Block. Still had to pay $300 and received no refund.....because I didn't make enough money.

Massage...Bored · Post by **Massage...Bored** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:45 am

adam atherton wrote:
bassjones wrote: Coherent arguable thought.

On a serious note, I do admire you guys' support structure. Its as if one cannot post without reassurance from the another. Its cute, really.

bassjones · Post by **bassjones** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:53 am

Not a word? They impeached the guy for chrissakes!

not a word from the now nag gang... and he wasn't impeached for the blow job. he was impeached for committing perjury.

Massage...Bored · Post by **Massage...Bored** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:56 am

bassjones wrote:
Not a word? They impeached the guy for chrissakes!
not a word from the now nag gang... and he wasn't impeached for the blow job. he was impeached for committing perjury.

Who is the Now Nag gang and why should I give a rat's ass about them, further more why should you?

WBOB · Post by **WBOB** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:56 am

Massage...Bored wrote:
adam atherton wrote:
bassjones wrote: Coherent arguable thought.
On a serious note, I do admire you guys' support structure. Its as if one cannot post without reassurance from the another. Its cute, really.

make that a "cute" conspiracy.

bassjones · Post by **bassjones** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:57 am

Massage...Bored wrote:
adam atherton wrote:
bassjones wrote: Coherent arguable thought.
On a serious note, I do admire you guys' support structure. Its as if one cannot post without reassurance from the another. Its cute, really.

adam rarely posts in here. and I don't really need his support. I think I handle myself just fine, thank you.

btw, while it may seem like it, that really wasn't intended as a slam. Lord knows I've worked some crappy ass jobs (including the current one) while in pursuit of my musical dreams and now college... It's your choice... screw the money, enjoy yourself.

bassjones · Post by **bassjones** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:59 am

Massage...Bored wrote:
bassjones wrote:
Not a word? They impeached the guy for chrissakes!
not a word from the now nag gang... and he wasn't impeached for the blow job. he was impeached for committing perjury.
Who is the Now Nag gang and why should I give a rat's ass about them, further more why should you?

NOW- the National Organization of Women (National Association of Gals)... the ones who were ready to crucify Clarence Thomas for far less offensive behavior. And I don't give a rat's ass about them. Just pointing out their lack of credibility from here on out on the issue of sexual harrassment.

Massage...Bored · Post by **Massage...Bored** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:00 pm

It wasn't just Atherton, its your whole Right Wing support group you guys got going in here. Where one treads, the other's are close behind.

WBOB · Post by **WBOB** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:01 pm

I'll try to remember how rich I am when I'm standing
in line at Aldis trying to deal with non English speaking
citizens cutting in line.

Massage...Bored · Post by **Massage...Bored** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:03 pm

bassjones wrote:NOW- the National Organization of Women (National Association of Gals)... the ones who were ready to crucify Clarence Thomas for far less offensive behavior. And I don't give a rat's ass about them. Just pointing out their lack of credibility from here on out on the issue of sexual harrassment.

Then why even bring them up? Why all the unnecessary name dropping?

Massage...Bored · Post by **Massage...Bored** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:05 pm

WBOB wrote:I'll try to remember how rich I am when I'm standing
in line at Aldis trying to deal with non English speaking
citizens cutting in line.

There's the Corporal!

Go to Meijer, buy generic brands, its just as cheap.

Haggard · Post by **Haggard** » Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:26 pm

I am still waiting on one positive thing he has done for us working class folk. The tax cut doesn't cut it, because right now I pay much more in taxes than I did even a few years back.